Disposed

Vinay Shanker Singh v. Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No. 15 , Sultanpur and 5 Others

Allahabad HC22 Apr 2024/1942/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expedited disposal of a civil suit as no extraordinary circumstances were disclosed, but granted liberty to approach the trial court with an application detailing urgency. The trial court was directed to consider such an application if filed within two weeks and decide it within three weeks if satisfied.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; liberty granted to file urgent application before trial court within two weeks for expedited hearing if made out.

Vinay Shanker Singh Vs Civil Judge (S.D.)… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:30991

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1942 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Vinay Shanker Singh Respondent :- Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No. 15 , Sultanpur And 5 Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Kumar Sambhav

¶6

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶7

Heard Sri Satish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Kumar Sambhav, learned counsel for India Oil Corporation.

¶8

In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are dispensed with.

¶9

By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Original Suit No. 459 of 2021 (Vinay Shankar Vs. Shahid Diwakar Filling Station and others) pending before Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Court No. 15, Sultanpur.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Court No. 15, Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

¶11

From the perusal of the writ petition, there is no disclosure of any extra ordinary circumstance as to why this Court should exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the trial court to decide the suit expeditiously.

¶12

This Court is conscious of the fact that the trial courts are burdened to heavy dockets and in a routine manner directions cannot be passed to the trial court to decide any particular case out of turn expeditiously. It is when some extra ordinary circumstance is made out only then it would be appropriate for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There also liberty should be given to the petitioner to place his grievances before the trial court who after looking into the urgency as well as dockets situation and pass appropriate orders to expedite the suit proceedings. In the present case no such circumstances has been mentioned or made out requiring interference of this Court

¶13

under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

¶14

However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditiously disposal of the suit before the trial court. In case, such application is moved within two weeks from today the trial court shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within three weeks thereafter. In case, the trial court is prima facie satisfied that a case for urgency is made out it shall pass suitable order thereon.

¶15

With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands disposed of.

¶16

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶17

Order Date :- 22.4.2024 Ravi/

¶18

Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vinay Shanker Singh v. Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No. 15 , Sultanpur and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Shanker Singh v. Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No. 15 , Sultanpur and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Maya Devi Vs Civil Judge (Jd) 1ST Gonda and Another

Shaji Varghese and Another Vs Civil Judge Senior Division Gonda and 2 Others

Shameena Rizwan Vs Principal Judge Family Court Sitapur and Another

Ram Lakhan and Others Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Faizabad and Others

Vikram Dixit Vs the Court, Additional Principal Judge Room No. 7 Family Court Lko. and Another

Ramawati Devi Vs Civil Judge(J.D.) Kaiserganj, Dist. Bahraich and 9 Others