Smt. Manorima v. Shubham Kumar Chauhan
Case brief
What is this about?
This application was dismissed for want of prosecution. No substantive legal proposition is articulated as the order is a one-line disposal vacating any interim order.
This application was dismissed for want of prosecution. No substantive legal proposition is articulated as the order is a one-line disposal vacating any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:77052
Court No. - 7
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 161 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt. Manorima Opposite Party :- Shubham Kumar Chauhan Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Arjun Singh Kalhans
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
List revised.
None is present for the applicant.
Present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.11.2024 nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Manorima
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court