Allowed

Srikeshan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

Allahabad HC13 Feb 2024/1592/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court dismissed the prosecution's opposition and allowed the bail application of Srikeshan. The court held that since the applicant was already on bail in the sole case represented in the gang chart, he was entitled to bail in the present instance.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.

Srikeshan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:12824

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1592 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Srikeshan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard Sri Ramesh Gupta holding brief of Sri Narendra Gupta, learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.683 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Maholi, District Sitapur.

¶8

3 . Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart. The copy of the bail order is on record. The applicant is in custody since 28.09.2023.

¶9

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Srikeshan be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 13.2.2024 akverma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Srikeshan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srikeshan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd. Nadeem Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, U.P. Lucknow

Piyush Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko

Irshad @ Chikna Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. (Home), U.P. Lucknow

Gaurav Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko.

Ram Sukh Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko.

Vijay Verma Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others