Irshad @ Chikna Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. (Home), U.P. Lucknow

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:12487

Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1567 of 2024 Applicant :- Irshad @ Chikna Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. (Home), U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Rizwanul Haque Ansari,Priyanka Yadav,Santi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶4

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶5

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.383 of 2023, under Section 2Kha(17)/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Palia, District Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶6

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the sole case referred to in the Gang Chart, the applicant has been granted bail. Copy of the bail order is on record.

¶7

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶8

5. Considering the fact that the applicant is on bail in the sole case referred to in the gang chart, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶9

6. Let the applicant Irshad @ Chikna be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶10

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶11

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶12

Order Date :- 12.2.2024 nishant

¶13

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Irshad @ Chikna v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. (Home), U.P. Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Irshad @ Chikna v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. (Home), U.P. Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Satyam Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Civil Secrett. Lko. and 3 Others

Bhola Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Faiyyaz Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko.

Mohd. Nadeem Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, U.P. Lucknow

Piyush Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko

Smt. Kamla Devi Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow