Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings in a case where parties had settled by compromise verified by the court concerned. Relying on precedent on quashing after compromise, the court quashed the charge-sheet and entire proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:14936
Court No. - 28
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1555 of 2024
Applicant :- Mani Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Homes, Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties.
Order Date :- 20.2.2024 dk/
Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings based on a verified compromise between the parties should be quashed using Section 482 Cr.P.C. inherent powers?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs State of PunjabRelied on
2012 AIR SCW 5333 · Who else cites this
B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of HaryanaRelied on
(2003) 3 SCC 675 · Who else cites this
Narinder Singh Vs State of PunjabRelied on
(2014) 6 SCC 466 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mani Gupta
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Homes, Lucknow
4 Others
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
