Applicant in nineteen criminal cases, already on bail in all, sought a direction that one personal bond and two sureties suffice for all. Relying on Hani Nishad (Supreme Court), the High Court permitted two sets of bonds covering cases 1-18 and case 19 respectively and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:15052
Court No. - 28
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1519 of 2024
Applicant :- Nihal Kharwar @ Nihal Kumar @ Nihal Kumhar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Order Date :- 20.2.2024 dk/
Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, granted bail in nineteen cases, may furnish one set of personal bond and two sureties common to all cases instead of separate bonds.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hani NIshad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar PradeshRelied on
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos.89148915/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nihal Kharwar @ Nihal Kumar @ Nihal Kumhar
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
