The writ petition regarding cancellation of a fair price shop license was disposed of, with the petitioner advised to utilize the statutory remedy of filing an appeal instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:12805
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1464 of 2024
Petitioner :- Raksharam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Manure And Logistics Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Nishad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 8 and Sri Vikram Dutt Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no. 9.
Admittedly, against the order of cancellation of fair price shop license, the petitioner has a statutory remedy of filing of an appeal.
Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to file an appeal, if aggrieved against the order impugned.
Order Date :- 13.2.2024 Pachhere/-
Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Raksharam
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Manure And Logistics Deptt. Lko.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
