Petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15963 of 2021 Petitioner :- Amrit Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko.And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Shanker Lal Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harish Chandra,Shiv Shankar Mishra
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Learned Standing Counsel and Shri Shiv Shankar Mishra, learned counsels are present on behalf of the respondents.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 12.2.2024 J.K. Dinkar
Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Amrit Lal
State Of U.P.
Abdul Moin
Jeshu Kumar Dinkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
