Disposed

Kamlesh Kumar v. Shri Anuj Singh, Collector/ D.M. Sitapur and Others

Allahabad HC3 May 2024/1426/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt application for punishing respondents for disobeying a writ order regarding land possession. The High Court disposed of the application, allowing parties to pursue pending writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Contempt application disposed of.

What the court decided

Kamlesh Kumar Vs Shri Anuj Singh, Collector/ D.M… — Contempt of Court | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34455

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1426 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar Opposite Party :- Shri Anuj Singh, Collector/ D.M. Sitapur And Others

¶5

Counsel for Applicant :- Anamika Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Arvind Kumar,Arvind Kumar

¶6

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶7

Affidavits filed by learned counsel for respondent no. 04 and learned counsel for the applicant are taken on record.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶9

The instant contempt application has been filed for initiating the contempt proceedings against the contemnors/respondents and for punishing them for deliberately and willfully disobeying and flouting the order dated 19.10.2023 passed in Writ-C No. 9172 of 2023.

¶10

It is informed by learned counsel for the parties that an order was passed by the Tehsildar in favour of Munna- respondent no. 04 who was allowed to keep the possession of Gata No. 117 which was recorded as 'Banzar' land in the revenue record. It is further informed that respondent no. 04 claimed that lease was allotted in favour of his predecessor in the year 1968, and one revision i.e. Revision No. 16 (State of U.P. vs. Munna) was filed under Sections 122-B(A)/333 U.P. Z.A. Act, which was allowed by the Collector, Sitapur on 10.12.2012 on the ground that respondent no. 04 failed to place the lease as claimed by him, thereafter, ceiling procedure has been adopted by the revenue authorities and the property was in possession of the authorities. Against the aforesaid order, Writ Petition No. 4152 (M/S) of 2013 was filed by respondent no. 04, which is pending, therefore, appropriate action under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code is not being taken.

¶11

Subject to above, the contempt application is disposed of .

¶12

It is open to the parties to pursue the aforesaid writ petition.

¶13

Order Date :- 3.5.2024 Arpan

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Kamlesh Kumar v. Shri Anuj Singh, Collector/ D.M. Sitapur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Kamlesh Kumar v. Shri Anuj Singh, Collector/ D.M. Sitapur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Neeraj Singh Vs Dr. D.R.Singh Chief Medical Officer Barabanki

Tulsi Gaur Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Homes Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Syed Abdul Mannan Vs Sri Vivek Srivastava, Secy. Lko. Development, Authority, Lko.

Madhevendra Singh vs Sri Ashok Kumar, Aqgarwal, Engineer in Chief Parkalp/Niyojan Public Works Deptt. Lko.

Jagdish Kumar vs Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi, Addl. Chief Secy. Agriculture Deptt. Lko. and Another

Tripti Shakya vs Central Bureau of Invetigation Thru. Its Superitemndent of Police and Another