Allowed

Bhishm Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs Lok Bhawan,Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC6 Mar 2024/1425/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, working as a security guard, sought an arm's license application filed over a year ago. The court directed the District Magistrate, Lucknow, to consider and decide the pending application expeditiously within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending application for arm's license bearing No.511 expeditiously within six weeks.

Bhishm Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:20500

¶2

Court No. - 6

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1425 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Bhishm Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Affairs Lok Bhawan,Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Trideep Narayan Pandey,Deepanker Kumar,Nivedita Shukla,Sachin Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard Ms. Charu Singh holding brief of Sri Trideep Narayan Pandey for the petitioner and the Standing counsel for the respondents.

¶7

It has been submitted that the petitioner has completed his studies upto senior secondary level and now he is earning his livelihood by serving as personal security guard/bouncer. It is in aforesaid circumstances and need of his job that he has applied for arm's license before the licensing authority i.e. District Magistrate, Lucknow on 13.10.2022. The application preferred by the petitioner was registered as Application No.511. It has submitted that the said application was complete in all respect and even subsequently the police report as well as report from the Chief Medical Officer has been obtained but even after expiry of more than one and half years, the application is pending and has not been considered and disposed of by the respondent. Accordingly, a prayer has been made for a suitable direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the application of the petitioner for grant of arm's license, expeditiously.

¶8

Learned Standing counsel does not object to the prayer made by the petitioner.

¶9

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Lucknow to consider and decide the application of the petitioner bearing No.511 which was filed on 13.10.2022, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law and communicate his decision to the petitioner.

¶10

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶11

Order Date :- 6.3.2024 RKM.

¶12

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Bhishm Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs Lok Bhawan,Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhishm Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs Lok Bhawan,Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Krishnawati Vs Collector Gonda and Others

Smt. Parvati Devi Vs Apar District Judge Court No. 8 Raebareli and Others

Vijay Shankar and 7 Ors. Vs District Judge Ambedkar Nagar and 4 Ors.

Rameshwar Prasad Soni Vs Commissioner Devi Patan Mandal Gonda and Ors.

Arvind Kumar Vs State of Up Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Supply Sect.and Others

Ajay Kumar Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate, Sultanpur and 3 Others