An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought a direction to the trial court to expeditiously decide a pending case under Sections 498A, 448, 504 and 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. Noting the applicant's own frequent absences and absence of exceptional circumstances, the court rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:384
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12819 of 2023
Applicant :- Suneel Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Himanshu Tiwari,Sunita Dwivedi,Surendra Kumar Mourya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 3.1.2024 Pradeep/-
Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the trial court to expedite disposal of Criminal Case No. 58100/17 pending against the applicant?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Suneel Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.
Another
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
