18. The petitioner's misconduct has been taken note of in detail in the minutes and, need not to be further dwelled upon by this Court. From the pleadings, it is evident that the petitioner had approached this Court for exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction by adopting falsehood, misrepresentation and concealing the material facts and, thus, abusing the process of the Court. He obtained the interim order on the basis of false and misleading averments and concealing material facts. One, who approaches this Court, is expected to come with clean hands inasmuch this Court exercises writ jurisdiction to maintain rule of law. The petitioner has not approached this Court with clean hands and, thus, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on this ground alone. Further, from looking at the service record of the petitioner, the petitioner has become 'dead wood' in the organization and, is wholly unuseful. The employer is entitled to remove the dead woods from service, if on consideration of the service record, it is found that the work of such an employee has not been upto the mark or he has become 'dead wood' for the organization. This Court does not find from the pleadings that the order has been passed as punishment and, therefore, the sole ground, urged by the petitioner, has no substance.
