The High Court directed the respondent No. 2 to dispose of Revision No. 1268 of 2020 pending before the Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra, by issuing a speaking order within six months. The writ petition was subsequently disposed of.
Directed respondent No. 2 to dispose of Revision No. 1268 of 2020 with a speaking order within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7492 of 2023
Petitioner :- Prabhash Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Rathore,Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Shri Sanjeev Kumar Rathore has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. He has filed the instant petition seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the Revision No. 1268 of 2020 between Dileep Kumar v. Prabhash Chandra pending before the Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra.
The respondent no.2 is directed to dispose of the appeal with speaking order within six months from today.
The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
(Prashant Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 17.3.2023 Rama Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAMAKANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent No. 2 should decide the Revision No. 1268 of 2020 pending before the Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra, and dispose of the appeal with a speaking order within six months.
Prabhash Chandra
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
