Bhola Nath Gupta v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed due to default as no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Writ petition dismissed due to default as no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:102522-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 71487 of 2009
Petitioner :- Bhola Nath Gupta Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagdish Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Mishra,Amit Dubey,R.K. Pandey
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.5.2023 A.Kr.
Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhola Nath Gupta
State of U.P.
Salil Kumar Rai
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court