The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a writ petition in default as the petitioner did not appear, while counsel for the respondent-Ghaziabad Development Authority was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:100600-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 70693 of 2006
Petitioner :- Harish Kumar Rawal And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- C.L. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Misra,Amit Manohar
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
List has been revised.
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners whereas Sri Amit Manohar, learned counsel for the respondent-Ghaziabad Development Authority is present.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.5.2023 S.Chaurasia
Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Harish Kumar Rawal And Another
State of U.P. and Others
Ghaziabad Development Authority
Salil Kumar Rai
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
