The High Court directed the respondent authority to conclude the pending proceedings in writ petition Case No. T202014700305448 within nine months of producing this order.
Direction to conclude pending proceedings within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6995 of 2023 Petitioner :- Savitri Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramji Singh Patel Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
Heard Shri Ramji Singh Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents as well as Shri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel representing the Gaon Sabha.
This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No. T202014700305448 (Savitri Devi vs Rakesh and others), under section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No. 2, U.P. Ziladhikari, Raja Talab, district Varanasi.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.
Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.
Order Date :- 6.4.2023 Sazia
Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Savitri Devi
State Of U.P.
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
