Petitioner sought direction for expeditious disposal of pending revenue proceedings before Sub Divisional Magistrate. Court directed respondent to allot computerized number and conclude matter within four months.
Direction to respondent No.2 to allot computerized number and conclude proceedings expeditiously within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8755 of 2023
Petitioner :- Shyam Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar,Lal Ji Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
Heard Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.
This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No. Nil of 2023 (Shyam Lal vs State of U.P.), under section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Khaga, District Fatehpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till today, the application filed under section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has not been allotted any number.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.
Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2, to allot a computerized number to the aforesaid proceedings of case and conclude the same, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of
the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.
Order Date :- 5.4.2023 Sazia
Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ Court should direct the Sub Divisional Magistrate to allot a computerized number and conclude pending proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shyam Lal
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
