Disposed

Waziullah v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC28 Mar 2023WRIC/6823/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Assistant Collector to dispose of pending proceedings in a case regarding Computerized Case No. T202117630107770 within six months. The Court also stipulated that personal appearance may be permitted if lawyers do not cooperate to ensure property rights are not adversely affected.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 to conclude proceedings expeditiously within six months; if lawyers do not cooperate, personal appearance of parties permitted.

Waziullah Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6823 of 2023 Petitioner :- Waziullah Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Prakash Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶2

Heard Shri Vijay Prakash Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing the Staterespondents as well as Shri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel representing the Gaon Sabha.

¶3

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Computerized Case No. T202117630107770 (Gram Sabha vs Zamil), under section 67(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending before respondent No. 2, Assistant Collector Ist Class/Tehsildar, Tehsil Naugarh, district Siddharth Nagar.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶5

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶6

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.

¶7

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶8

Order Date :- 28.3.2023 Sazia

¶9

Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Waziullah v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Waziullah v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharam Dei Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Abdul Naseem Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Mohd. Shamim Vs State of U.P. and 15 Others

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Jaggannath Vs State of U.P. and 46 Others

Ishwar Yadav and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others