The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the writ petition after holding that an appeal lies before the Commissioner under the Uttar Pradesh Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016.
None; Petitioner directed to prefer appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6682 of 2023
Petitioner :- Rupam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Pati Singh Yadav,Sheo Prasad Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
There is a preliminary objection that against the impugned action, an appeal lies before the Commissioner under Section 13(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016.
The petitioner may prefer an appeal in terms of the statutory provisions as cited above.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed off .
Order Date :- 13.3.2023 nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rupam
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Nishant Mohan
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
