High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, noting that plea was abandoned due to efflux of time or loss of petitioner's interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:108598-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 65663 of 2011
Petitioner :- Rama Kant Upadhyay Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C.,A. P. Srivastava,Shri Kant,Yashodanand Shukla
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears for the petitioner.
From the pleadings and the prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that either the petition has become infructuous by efflux of time or the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the petition.
In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 18.5.2023 S.Chaurasia
Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rama Kant Upadhyay
State Of U.P.
Salil Kumar Rai
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
