In an unopposed writ petition, the Allahabad High Court, on the finding that the matter became infructuous due to efflux of time or loss of interest, dismissed the petition and vacated any interim order.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous and any interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:107928-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 50953 of 2011
Petitioner :- Genda Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vidit Narayan Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anuj Srivastava,Ramendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Sri Anuj Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
We have perused the record.
From pleadings and the prayer made in the petition, it appears that either the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time or the petitioner has lost his interest.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.5.2023 A.Kr.
Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time or loss of interest.
Genda Singh
State of U.P.
Salil Kumar Rai
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
