The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time or lack of interest by the petitioner to prosecute the case further.
None; the petition was dismissed as infructuous and interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:110008-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 59256 of 2009
Petitioner :- Sher Mohammad And Others Respondent :- Regional Transport Authority Ghaziabad And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- V.N. Mishra,A.C.Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aditya Bhushan Singhal,Ramendra P. Singh
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears for the petitioner.
Shri Aditya Bhushan Singhal, the counsel for the respondents is present.
It appears from the pleadings and the prayer made in the writ petition that the petition has become infructuous by efflux of time or the petitioner has no interest to further prosecute the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.5.2023 Vipasha
Digitally signed by :- VIPASHA MUKHERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sher Mohammad And Others
Regional Transport Authority Ghaziabad And Ors.
Salil Kumar Rai
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
