A writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance even in a revised Call Listing. No other substantive issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5797 of 2020
Petitioner :- M/s Oyster Pharma Private Limited Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 30 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyamal Kumar Prayagi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
Order Date :- 18.7.2023 skv
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
M/s Oyster Pharma Private Limited
State Of U.P.
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
