Petitioner challenged delay in releasing compensation awarded for compulsory land acquisition. Court dismissed petition with direction to respondent to decide representation on compensation and pay amount within three months.
Direction to respondent no.2 to decide petitioner's representation on compensation and pay amount within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:237371-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43011 of 2023
Petitioner :- Gopi Nath Agarwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Khandelwal Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Abhishek Singh
(S. S. Prasad, J.) (S. D. Singh, J.)
Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent may be directed to decide the representation regarding compensation for land acquisition within a time limit?
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a reasoned order and release of awarded compensation?
Gopi Nath Agarwal
State Of U.P.
Respondent no.3
Respondent no.4
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Shiv Shanker Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
