Petitioner sought eviction or compensation for land allegedly encroached by Gaon Sabha. Court held inherently disputed facts precluded writ adjudication.
Interference declined; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:238082-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42451 of 2023
Petitioner :- Brijnath Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghvendra Shankar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
Order Date :- 15.12.2023 SK Srivastava
(Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.) . . . (S.D. Singh,J)
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Brijnath Yadav
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Shiv Shanker Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
