Rakesh Kumar Maurya v. State of U.P. and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition against private respondents as not maintainable, directing the petitioner to seek common law remedies instead.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:237777-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42425 of 2023
Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Azad Rai
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
- Petitioner claims injunction against the private respondents.
- By very nature of relief claimed, the writ petition is found to be not maintainable against the private respondents.
- Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed , leaving it open to the petitioner to avail his remedy under the common law.
- Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no. 8 and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents are present.
Order Date :- 15.12.2023 SK Srivastava
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition against private respondents is maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rakesh Kumar Maurya
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/42425/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court