The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent was present. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:153109-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41807 of 2019
Petitioner :- Krishna Mohan Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Nigam
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. Case has been called out in the revised list.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant writ petition. However, Mr. Manoj Nigam, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 31.7.2023 Sachin/
Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Mohan Rai
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
