The petition praying for directions regarding a complaint under Section 35 of the Advocates Act was dismissed as infructuous because the impugned order had already been passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:151419-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18861 of 2023
Petitioner :- Gangaram Respondent :- Sompal Kashyap And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshuman Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 28.7.2023 A.K.Srivastava
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gangaram
Sompal Kashyap
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
