The court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as none of the petitioner was present and counsel was unavailable on multiple dates.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39745 of 2022
Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kandarp Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
None is present for the petitioner even in revised call.
On 11.01.2023 also counsel for the petitioner was not present but in the interest of justice, the case was adjourned. On 17.01.2023, learned counsel for the petitioner got the case adjourned.
The writ petition is dismised for want of prosecution.
(Vikram D. Chauhan, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 24.1.2023 Ruhi
Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Amit Kumar
Union Of India
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
