The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Mahendra Kumar against the State of UP and two others for want of prosecution due to multiple adjournments sought by the petitioner's counsel.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39701 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Singh. Rajput Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Baleshwar Chaturvedi,Gaurav Tripathi,Paras Nath Rai
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Matter taken up in revised call. None is present for the petitioner. Sri P.N. Rai, and Sri Gaurav Tripathi are present for the respondents.
On 11.01.2023 also, learned counsel for the petitioner was not present but in the interest of justice, the case was adjourned. Again on 17.01.2023, counsel for the petitioner got the matter adjourned.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Vikram D. Chauhan, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 24.1.2023 Ruhi
Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahendra Kumar
State Of U P
2 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
