The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because a subsequent cognizance of the First Information Report against the second petitioner rendered the original proceeding unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:232893
Court No. - 85
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39467 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Kiran And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
Order Date :- 8.12.2023 SY
Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Kiran
Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Mayank Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
