The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad declined to interfere in a writ petition concerning a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, holding that the petitioner has an adequate remedy of appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
The writ petition is disposed of; no interference is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:230621-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39007 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sanjay Bhati And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Nandan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Atul Tej Kulshrestha
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
Order Date :- 5.12.2023 SK Srivastava
(Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.) . . . (S.D. Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere when the petitioner has an adequate remedy of appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Bhati
Another
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Shiv Shanker Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
