Disposed

Rodrigo Bazzo Dinardi v. Union of India and 5 Others

Allahabad HC5 Dec 2023WRIC/34291/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition challenging a deportation order and seeking directions for citizenship processing and visa extension, the court dismissed the application by disposing of the matter on the same terms as a related judgment (Elizabeth Cahil) without detailing specific grounds or granting the sought relief.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of on the terms of a related judgment without granting the specific reliefs sought.

Rodrigo Bazzo Dinardi Vs Union of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:231739-DB

¶2

Court No. - 39

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34291 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Rodrigo Bazzo Dinardi Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghav Dev Garg,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Sanjay Kumar Om

¶5

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Anurag Khanna, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Raghav Dev Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.P. Singh, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned counsel for Union of India.

¶7

The present writ petition has been pressed seeking the following relief:

¶8

i Issue writ, order of direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 13.03.2023 issued by the respondent no.2 herein, i.e. Foreigners Regional Registration Officer, Lucknow whereby while exercising powers under section 3 (2)(c) of the Foreigners Act, 1946, the petitioner, who is a Brazilian national, was directed to depart from India immediately.

¶9

ii Issue writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents herein, specifically the respondent no.1 to process the application of the petitioner seeking citizenship by naturalization under Section 6 of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which is pending since 03.11.2022, in an expeditious manner and in the interregnum, the respondents be restrained from taking coercive steps apropos the stay of the petitioner in India.

¶10

iii Issue writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to grant extension of the honorary employment visa, applied through application dated 26.06.2022.

¶11

By the communication dated 13.3.2023, the petitioner’s Visa extension application was rejected. The Foreigners Regional Registration Officer, Lucknow informed the petitioner that under

¶12

section 3 (2) (c) of the Foreigners Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the petitioner shall not remain in India and that he shall depart, immediately.

¶13

On identical facts, a separate order of the date has been passed in Writ-C No. 35732 of 2023 'Elizabeth Cahil vs. Union of India and 5 others'. .

¶14

Accordingly, the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same terms.

¶15

Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Madhurima

¶16

Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rodrigo Bazzo Dinardi v. Union of India and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rodrigo Bazzo Dinardi v. Union of India and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Soni Vs Vinod Kumar Gupta

Pankaj Chaubey Vs Shruti Chaubey

Pankaj Gautam Vs Smt Vandana Devi

Elizabeth Cahill Vs Union of India and 5 Others

Sanjay Bhati and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Tilakraj and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru Secy. and Others