A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38841 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ram Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yamuna Pandey,Harsh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Case called out, no one responds on behalf of the petitioner.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
Office to proceed.
Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Rakesh
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Pal Singh
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
