Dismissed
Terasu Lal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/36507/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36507 of 2022
Petitioner :- Terasu Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Saxena,Kishan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Case called out, no one responds on behalf of the petitioner.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
Office to proceed.
Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Rakesh
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Terasu Lal
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
Vivek Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court