Petitioner sought mandamus to remove illegal encroachment on public land in Jaunpur. This court dismissed the petition as the grievance was redressed after authorities finalized proceedings and removed the encroachment.
No further relief granted as encroachment was already removed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:220374
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37939 of 2023
Petitioner :- Shobh Nath Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Upadhyay,Vikram Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 21.11.2023 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a directing order removing illegal encroachment is still required given that proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were finalized and encroachment removed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shobh Nath
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
