This PIL concerned illegal encroachment on a Primary School and prompted the Court to examine procedural initiation of revenue proceedings and the petitioner's cause of action accordingly.
Direction to respondent no.4 (DB Eo) to consider the facts narrated by the Head Mistress of the school regarding the encroachment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:220800
Court No. - 52
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2615 of 2023
Petitioner :- Munendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhu Ranjan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avinash Chandra Srivastava
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
the factual position as narrated by the Head Mistress of Girls Primary School Himayunpur as submitted before District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri, if required, statement of the Head Mistress may also be recorded for arriving over the conclusion of proceedings initiated under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Order Date :- 21.11.2023 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has any cause of action once proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have been initiated against encroachers.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Munendra Singh
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
