The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a writ petition filed by a complainant seeking directions for an enquiry and Gram Sabha meeting. The Court held the petition non-maintainable, citing lack of locus standi in similar precedents.
Writ petition dismissed on the ground that it is not maintainable as the petitioner lacks locus standi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:209261-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37668 of 2023
Petitioner :- Anita Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh Yadav,Brij Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Manish Himwan
Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed by a complainant for directing an enquiry is maintainable.
Whether the petitioner has locus standi to file the present writ petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Amin Khan v. State of U.P.Referred¶10
Amin Khan v. State of U.P., 2008 (2) AWC 2002
Guru Prasad Yadav v. State of U.P. and othersReferred¶10
Special Appeal No.382 of 2008, Guru Prasad Yadav v. State of U.P. and others
Anita Devi
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
