The State's counsel stated the writ petition no longer survives. The single-judge bench dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3753 of 2019
Petitioner :- Chandi And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramanuj Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Virendra Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Learned Standing counsel for the State respondent states that the cause for filing the present writ petition no more survive and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.1.2023 Bhanu
Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandi And Another
State Of U P And 4 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
