This is a short order where the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the cause for filing no longer survives due to the payment of Sugar Cane.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37935 of 2022
Petitioner :- Arjun And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Patel,Ashutosh Kumar Gautam
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition.
Shri Abhijeet Chaterji, Advocate holding brief of Shri Diptiman Singh, Advocate and Shri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents states that cause for filing the writ petition no more survive as payment of Sugar Cane has already been made and the petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.1.2023 Bhanu
Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arjun
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
