, the High Court directed the concerned authority to decide a pending mutation application under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37215 of 2022
Petitioner :- Uma Devi Respondent :- State Of U P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Kumar Singh,Sarfaraz Ahmad
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The sole grievance of the petitioner is that the Mutation Application being Case No. T202205440100378, under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, was not being decided and, therefore, a prayer for a direction has been made that the case be decided expeditiously within a stipulated period of time.
Learned Standing Counsel states that all endeavour shall be made to decide the aforesaid Case.
Under such circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, it is being directed that the Case No. T202205440100378, under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, be decided within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.1.2023 PK
(Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction is to be issued for the expeditious disposal of a pending mutation application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Uma Devi
State Of U P
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
