The second division bench dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:227663-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37087 of 2023
Petitioner :- Manjoj Kumar Paswan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Chandra Kushwaha,Mayank Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
List has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition even in the revised call.
Learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 1.12.2023 Rama Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAMAKANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Manjoj Kumar Paswan
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
