The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a writ petition filed by Sushila and others for want of prosecution as the petitioner was not present during the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:205320
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36903 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sushila (Since Deceased) And 2 Others Respondent :- Shahabuddin And 16 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jaichandra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Even in the revised call, none present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Standing counsel for the State respondent is present.
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution . Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.10.2023 A.N. Mishra
Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sushila And 2 Others
Shahabuddin And 16 Others
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
