Disposed

Jaiveer Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 10 Others

Allahabad HC26 Oct 2023WRIC/36731/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authority to consider and decide a specific case under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within nine months after providing a hearing opportunity. The petition was disposed of with this directive.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to decide Case No.506/2023 under Section 116 U.P. Revenue Code within nine months after hearing.

Jaiveer Singh and 2 Others Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:204058

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36731 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Jaiveer Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyaveer Singh Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Avinash Chandra Srivastava

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Satyaveer Singh, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents no.1 to 3 as well as Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.11.

¶7

Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.3 to decide Case No.506/2023, Computer Case No.T202301260100506 (Ramesh Chandra Vs. Smt. Asha Rani), under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

¶8

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid matter is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶10

Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.3 is hereby directed to consider and decide the Case No.506/2023, Computer Case No.T202301260100506 (Ramesh Chandra Vs. Smt. Asha Rani), under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.

¶11

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 26.10.2023/Vivek Kr.

¶13

Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jaiveer Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 10 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaiveer Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 10 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivendra Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sanjay Vs State of U.P. and 14 Others

Kusum Pandey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Smt Umawati Devi Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Banshraj Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ram Nagina Yadav Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 8 Others