Single judge order granting direction to respondent authority to expeditiously decide a pending appeal, directing the petitioner to be heard.
Respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the Appeal No.83/ under Section 38(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:204082
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36704 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ram Nagina Yadav Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pavan Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 26.10.2023/Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition filed seeking direction to decide Appeal No.83/ under Section 38(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously can be granted direction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Nagina Yadav
State Of Uttar Pradesh
Saurabh Srivastava
Vivek Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
