The High Court at Allahabad dismissed a writ petition as infructuous upon the Additional Standing Counsel representing the State stating that an FIR had been lodged against the second petitioner, making the relief sought unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:216786
Court No. - 85
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35814 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sonam And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijai Prakash Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
Learned Additional Standing counsel states that in this matter F.I.R. has been lodged against petitioner no.2, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.11.2023 AKT
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sonam And Another
State Of U.P. And 7 Others
Mayank Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
