The court disposed of a writ petition challenging a notice on land exempted from ceiling proceedings. It directed the authority to decide the petitioner's representation within two months and maintained status quo on title and possession.
Decision of representation within two months; status quo on title and possession till decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35460 of 2023
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijai Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 13.10.2023 S.P.
Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's representation against the impugned notice regarding ceaseless exemption from ceiling proceedings be disposed of.
What direction to issue to the authority concerning the status of the disputed land pending the decision of the representation.
Anil Kumar and Another
State of U.P. and 2 Others
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
