Writ petition dismissed as not pressed by learned counsel for the petitioner, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. No substantive law or substantive decision of general application stated.
Liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:194395
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32357 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ram Lakhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pushpendra Kumar Mishra,Bateshwar Nath Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Achal Singh
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
1.Heard Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Mr. Achal Singh, learned Counsel for Gaon Sabha.
Order Date :- 10.10.2023
PS*
Digitally signed by :- PRITI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Lakhan
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Chandra Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
