Sadiq Khan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal appeal was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant died and no family member sought leave to continue the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed being abated.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:177601-DB
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2940 of 2006
Appellant :- Sadiq Khan Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Anil Mullick,Madhur Prakash,Salman Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
- As per office report dated 18.08.2023, sole appellant Sadiq Khan has expired. His death has also been confirmed by the concerned CJM.
- As there is no application by the family member or any of his near relative of the appellant seeking leave to continue the appeal, the same is accordingly dismissed being abated.
Order Date :- 13.9.2023 rkg
(Ashutosh Srivastava, J.) (Pritinker Diwaker, CJ.)
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sadiq Khan
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Pritinker Diwaker
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/2940/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court