The court dismissed a writ petition seeking an injunction against private respondents, holding such relief is unavailable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without expressing an opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31269 of 2022
Petitioner :- Pankaj Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sufia Saba,Abdul Majeed Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.
The petitioner has sought the relief in the nature of injunction against private respondents. Such a relief cannot be granted in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Therefore, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available to him under law.
Order Date :- 1.2.2023 A. V. Singh
Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an injunction against private respondents can be granted in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Pankaj Sharma
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
